問(wen) 最近(jin)在新聞上經常會看到(dao)“過(guo)(guo)勞(lao)死(si)”的員(yuan)工(gong)，想(xiang)咨詢一(yi)下(xia)，“過(guo)(guo)勞(lao)死(si)”可以被認定為工(gong)傷么？

答(da) 工(gong)(gong)傷(shang)保險條例規定“在(zai)工(gong)(gong)作(zuo)(zuo)時(shi)間(jian)和工(gong)(gong)作(zuo)(zuo)崗(gang)(gang)位，突發(fa)疾(ji)病(bing)死(si)(si)亡或者(zhe)在(zai)48小時(shi)之內經搶救無效死(si)(si)亡的，可認定為工(gong)(gong)傷(shang)”。“過勞(lao)(lao)死(si)(si)”就是(shi)(shi)在(zai)工(gong)(gong)作(zuo)(zuo)時(shi)間(jian)和工(gong)(gong)作(zuo)(zuo)崗(gang)(gang)位突發(fa)疾(ji)病(bing)死(si)(si)亡，因此“過勞(lao)(lao)死(si)(si)”認定為工(gong)(gong)傷(shang)的關(guan)鍵在(zai)于是(shi)(shi)否在(zai)工(gong)(gong)作(zuo)(zuo)時(shi)間(jian)和工(gong)(gong)作(zuo)(zuo)崗(gang)(gang)位。如果能夠證明是(shi)(shi)在(zai)工(gong)(gong)作(zuo)(zuo)時(shi)間(jian)、工(gong)(gong)作(zuo)(zuo)崗(gang)(gang)位上發(fa)生的，則應該主(zhu)張為工(gong)(gong)傷(shang)。