集體合同與勞動合同的區別是什么?

[合同協議] ???解決者:熱心網友

問(wen) 我想這里(li)問一(yi)下,集體(ti)合(he)同(tong)(tong)與勞動合(he)同(tong)(tong)的(de)區別(bie)是什么?知道的(de)可以說一(yi)下嗎?謝(xie)謝(xie)!

第(di)一,簽(qian)(qian)(qian)約主(zhu)體(ti)(ti)(ti)不(bu)同(tong)(tong)(tong)。集(ji)體(ti)(ti)(ti)合(he)(he)(he)(he)(he)同(tong)(tong)(tong)是(shi)由職(zhi)(zhi)工(gong)代表與(yu)用(yong)人單(dan)位(wei)(wei)簽(qian)(qian)(qian)訂(ding),而(er)勞(lao)(lao)動(dong)(dong)合(he)(he)(he)(he)(he)同(tong)(tong)(tong)是(shi)由勞(lao)(lao)動(dong)(dong)者本(ben)人與(yu)用(yong)工(gong)單(dan)位(wei)(wei)簽(qian)(qian)(qian)訂(ding)。 第(di)二,簽(qian)(qian)(qian)訂(ding)程序不(bu)同(tong)(tong)(tong)。集(ji)體(ti)(ti)(ti)合(he)(he)(he)(he)(he)同(tong)(tong)(tong)需(xu)由職(zhi)(zhi)工(gong)代表與(yu)用(yong)人單(dan)位(wei)(wei)先(xian)行協商合(he)(he)(he)(he)(he)同(tong)(tong)(tong)草案,經職(zhi)(zhi)工(gong)代表大會或者全(quan)體(ti)(ti)(ti)職(zhi)(zhi)工(gong)討論通(tong)過;而(er)勞(lao)(lao)動(dong)(dong)合(he)(he)(he)(he)(he)同(tong)(tong)(tong)由職(zhi)(zhi)工(gong)本(ben)人與(yu)用(yong)工(gong)單(dan)位(wei)(wei)直(zhi)接簽(qian)(qian)(qian)訂(ding)。 第(di)三,生效(xiao)條件不(bu)同(tong)(tong)(tong)。集(ji)體(ti)(ti)(ti)合(he)(he)(he)(he)(he)同(tong)(tong)(tong)簽(qian)(qian)(qian)訂(ding)后應當(dang)報送勞(lao)(lao)動(dong)(dong)行政部(bu)門(men),勞(lao)(lao)動(dong)(dong)行政部(bu)門(men)自收到(dao)集(ji)體(ti)(ti)(ti)合(he)(he)(he)(he)(he)同(tong)(tong)(tong)之日(ri)起15日(ri)內未提出異議(yi)的,集(ji)體(ti)(ti)(ti)合(he)(he)(he)(he)(he)同(tong)(tong)(tong)即行生效(xiao);而(er)勞(lao)(lao)動(dong)(dong)合(he)(he)(he)(he)(he)同(tong)(tong)(tong)依法訂(ding)立即具有(you)法律約束力(li)。 第(di)四,效(xiao)力(li)所(suo)調整的主(zhu)體(ti)(ti)(ti)范圍不(bu)同(tong)(tong)(tong)。集(ji)體(ti)(ti)(ti)合(he)(he)(he)(he)(he)同(tong)(tong)(tong)生效(xiao)后,對用(yong)工(gong)單(dan)位(wei)(wei)和單(dan)位(wei)(wei)全(quan)體(ti)(ti)(ti)職(zhi)(zhi)工(gong)具有(you)約束力(li);而(er)勞(lao)(lao)動(dong)(dong)合(he)(he)(he)(he)(he)同(tong)(tong)(tong)生效(xiao)后僅適(shi)用(yong)于職(zhi)(zhi)工(gong)本(ben)人和用(yong)工(gong)單(dan)位(wei)(wei)。